首页> 外文OA文献 >Differential predictability of four dimensions of affect intensity.
【2h】

Differential predictability of four dimensions of affect intensity.

机译:影响强度四个维度的差异可预测性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Individual differences in affect intensity are typically assessed with the Affect Intensity Measure (AIM). Previous factor analyses suggest that the AIM is comprised of four weakly correlated factors: Positive Affectivity, Negative Reactivity, Negative Intensity and Positive Intensity or Serenity. However, little data exist to show whether its four factors relate to other measures differently enough to preclude use of the total scale score. The present study replicated the four-factor solution and found that subscales derived from the four factors correlated differently with criterion variables that assess personality domains, affective dispositions, and cognitive patterns that are associated with emotional reactions. The results show that use of the total AIM score can obscure relationships between specific features of affect intensity and other variables and suggest that researchers should examine the individual AIM subscales.
机译:影响强度的个体差异通常通过影响强度评估(AIM)进行评估。先前的因素分析表明,AIM由四个弱相关的因素组成:正情感,负反应性,负强度和正强度或宁静。但是,几乎没有数据显示其四个因素是否与其他衡量指标有足够的差异,以至于无法使用总分评分。本研究复制了四因素解决方案,发现从四个因素得出的分量表与评估人格域,情感倾向和与情绪反应相关的认知模式的标准变量具有不同的相关性。结果表明,使用总的AIM得分可以掩盖情感强度的特定特征与其他变量之间的关系,并建议研究人员应检查各个AIM分量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号